Nearly one quarter of all global
internet traffic is involved in the piracy of copyrighted media, as of 2016
according to research reports by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. That fact
by itself is shocking in scope. It’s the sort of lynchpin fact that could
easily headline a staunch anti-piracy campaign, which are more in favor now sincethe solely dramatic anti-piracy advertisements of the early 2000s were far fromsuccessful. In fact piracy bandwidth – the total data used by digital piracy –
has increased by roughly 50% annually since the premiere of the FBI’s You Wouldn’t Steal A… campaign. Growing
at an almost exponential rate, despite shutdowns of The Pirate Bay and
MegaShare, it’s clear the hydra that is 21st century piracy is not
one to die soon.
(You Wouldn't Steal A... campaign, circa 2002).
I bring up these statistics for
their precise face value, they’re numbers. Numbers evoke a very analytical and
very dry part of our brains, and just as usual as they are for objectively quantify
a situation, they are just as prone to distract. In the case of piracy, the list
of statistics are a long one, just take a look at this infographic prepared by Creative
Future – an anti-piracy group based out of Los Angeles:
Source:
Creative Future. 2016.
These numbers evoke issues that are
rooted in economics and finances, imports and exports, legal codes and
legislation. It becomes drier and drier the more we talk about it. In fact, the
US Congress has not updated the Copyright Act of 1976 since a digital amendment
was added in 1998, back when transferring a movie online would take almost a
week compared to the minutes it can be today. Congress hates debating this issue
– especially now that Google has become the single largest lobbying group in
Washington DC. Little is expected to change as our digital econoy has irrevocably
grown around our lax digital copyright laws.
There is a definite status quo with our
piracy, both legally and on a broader cultural spectrum. It is something we
have accepted worldwide as part of our 21st century lifestyle – at least
25% of the world certainly agree. And it’s a dangerous one, but not for the
numerical reasons that so cloud the issue:
Ruth Vitale (CEO, CreativeFuture) was particularly vocal
about its negative consequences. One shocking case study she noted related to
Dallas Buyers Club (for which Jared Leto won an Oscar). Jean-Marc Vallée’s 2013
film generated about 7 million theatrical ticket sales. But, it amassed some 21
million illegal downloads, or about three times more than the legal
transactions.
[Ms. Vitale later added] “It is sad whenever an artist
doesn’t get compensated for their painstaking work. In this example, though, I
do like to see an indie film like The Rendezvous and director Amin Matalqa get
as much exposure as possible.”
There’s no doubt that piracy hurts
small sleeper hits like Dallas Buyer’s
Club or The Rendezvous, and we know
that before the numbers are even presented. But there’s a cost that stretches
beyond simple box office tickets. For a film like Dallas Buyers Club, most of the crew was paid close to minimum
wage, banking on ‘back end points’ or a small percentage of the net profits if
the film did well. The film was successful, but never broke past its initial
production cost. Many of the filmmakers, as Ruth Vitale can testify, are
struggling to find work, and some may exit the film industry all together. Amin
Matalqa, after working near a decade on his feature rather apathetically admitted
it’s likely his last. And that’s the unseen cost behind the millions of tickets
we tend to focus our attention on.
We’ve all seen that seemingly more
and more superhero movies are being made each year, and hardly anything else
reaches the silver screen. That’s not simply Hollywood greed as many a
laptop-warrior might decry as he pirates The
Dark Knight for the umpteenth time, but a symptom of an industry hemorrhaging
money on smaller projects like Dallas
Buyers Club. As a consequence, less and less of these smaller movies are
being made, relying of the tentpole blockbusters to rake in the years net
profits for the studios.
Through all of this we forget that
our arts are the glue that bind us together as a society. Every year there is a
movie that fundamentally shapes the way we perceive the world. We have to look
just under a century ago to the iconic Birth
of a Nation and its distasteful blackface to glimpse into the tense racial
divisions that plagued the 20th century. Gone with the Wind brought to light Hattie McDaniel, the first
African American actress to garner the Academy Award for Best Supporting
Actress – a cultural milestone in our long history of racial injustice. And in
2014 amidst a wave of 21st century discussion of sexuality and gay
marriage, The Dallas Buyers Club
brought to light issues sexuality through the AIDS epidemic in the most
heartbreaking of stories following a homophobe stricken with HIV.
These pictorial stories aren’t just for
entertainment, but bring to light cultural issues we are waging everyday as a
global community. It’s a price that a dollar sign can’t measure, but the voices
of our creative communities cannot be stifled as we try and tackle issues of
inner city poverty, racism, and sexism. These stories carry an important weight
with a power equal if not greater than the journalists of The New York Times.
The fight against piracy isn’t a just a legal one as the FBI banner’s might
make you think, but a cultural one.
Support Art. Stop Piracy.
Sources:
http://www.starkinsider.com/2016/10/state-film-industry-tackles-amazonnetflix-piracy-technology-led-disruption.html
I really like your post here. I think there is a kind of passive acceptance in our generation that if you can get something for free, why would you pay? And to a certain extent that seems to make sense; but that doesn't man there isn't a hidden cost like you pointed out. Also, these pirating sites are full of malware and other viruses that can hide on your computer and steal information. I'm not sure what it will take for piracy to stop...maybe people actually being tracked down and fined?
ReplyDeleteI totally disagree with you here Spencer. Piracy may be a big problem for big studios, but, for artists operating with smaller budgets, I do not see howe it matters.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, Indie movies are made with the assumption that they are going to get distributed by big studios. Second off, indie movies don't rely on the box office to make their profits. In fact, many people who make small budget movies do not do it for the immediate returns, but rather, for the revenue made after awards season. For example, Matthew Mcconaughey did not act in "Dallas Buyer's Club" for the immediate return. He acted in it for the DVD sales and the Academy Awards.
Pirating, in my estimation, does not anger indie movie directors. In fact, all indie movie directors care about are movie awards.
That's not to say they are cynically making movies for awards. Obviously people have legitimate reasons for making movies.
Delete